Plato, Republic (Book 2-3 Excerpt)
Aristotle, Ethics (Book 2 Excerpt)
Alan Bloom, 'Music,' from The Closing of the American Mind
Scruton, Music and Morality
In this course, students will study the genealogy of modern music, examining the strands of thought and practice that led to the pop/classical divide which emerged in the 20th Century. Students will work towards making objective judgements on music as an art, integrating the study of philosophy, history, and musicology. No experience in music is required - just a willingness to shake it off and listen intently!
Plato, Republic (Book 2-3 Excerpt)
Aristotle, Ethics (Book 2 Excerpt)
Alan Bloom, 'Music,' from The Closing of the American Mind
Scruton, Music and Morality
Benjamin Crocker is the Director of Special Programs and Associate Director of Admissions at the University of Austin. He is from North Queensland, Australia, and previously taught at The King’s School, and The University of Sydney.
In Australia, Mr. Crocker has conducted the Queensland and Tasmanian Symphony Orchestras, and recorded for nationwide radio broadcast at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Mr. Crocker holds a B.Mus. from the Queensland Conservatorium of Music, a teaching diploma from the University of Southern Queensland, and an M.A. from St. John’s College, Annapolis.
In the Apology, Socrates is presented by Plato as someone who is fearless in the pursuit of truth—even if it means upsetting his fellow citizens and breaking the law. Socrates defends the philosophic life as a sort of divine mission that supersedes the authority of Athens, and he envisions his role as a kind of gadfly, pestering and waking a slumbering city. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates is presented with the possibility of escape. Ultimately, he turns down this offer, suggesting that it would be unjust for him to avoid conviction and punishment. On the one hand, we see a man wrestling with the demands of truth—the good man. On the other hand, we see a man wrestling with the laws of the city that raised, nourished, and protected him—the good citizen. Are these two things in permanent tension, or can the good citizen truly be a good man?
Discussion One: Plato, Apology, pt. 1
Discussion Two: Plato, Apology, pt. 2
Discussion Three: Plato, Crito, pt. 1
Discussion Four: Plato, Crito, pt. 2
Jacob Wolf was formerly Assistant Professor of Government in the Honors College and the College of Arts and Sciences at Regent University, where he was also the Associate Director of the Lincoln Program in America's Founding Ideals. Before these positions, Jacob was the 2020-2021 John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Fellow in the James Madison Program at Princeton University. He received his Ph.D. in political science from Boston College in 2020, double-majoring in political theory and American politics. He studies the social and religious ramifications of expressive individualism. His academic writing has been published in Perspectives on Political Science, Political Science Reviewer, Interpretation, and The Public Discourse, and he is the 2022 recipient of the Jack Miller Center's Award for Excellence in Civic Education.
If you ask yourself, 'What is the good life?' or, 'What will make me happy?' you will immediately encounter certain unquestioned opinions. If you take the further step of actually questioning those opinions, you will find that they come from the political regime under which you happen to live. To seek to live a truly good life, one based not on opinion but on genuine insight, therefore, requires questioning the goodness of one's regime. In this course, we will, with the help of Plato, investigate the relationship between democracy, the regime devoted to freedom and equality, and the good life.
Plato: Republic, Book 1, 330d-339e
Plato: Republic, Book 2, 357a-368c
Plato: Republic, Book 6, 487a–489d, 496a–497d
Plato: Republic, Book 8, 559d–563e
Alex Priou received a Ph.D. and M.A. in Philosophy from Tulane University, an M.A. in Liberal Arts from St. John’s College, and a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Connecticut.
Priou is the author of three books on Plato: "Becoming Socrates: Political Philosophy in Plato’s Parmenides" (2018), "Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science" (2023), and "Musings on Plato’s 'Symposium'" (2023). He has also written essays on the history of philosophy for various journals and edited volumes in Classics, Philosophy, Political Science, Literature, and Film, including studies of Homer, Hesiod, Parmenides, Plato, Aristotle, and beyond. He also engages in public scholarship, occasionally writing for a general audience, but most frequently with The New Thinkery, a weekly podcast he co-hosts with his two close friends, Gregory McBrayer and David Bahr. Together, they aim to model friendly and fun conversations between friends on texts and topics in the history of philosophy.
Priou is currently at work on a book on Plato’s that will offer a comprehensive overview of its drama that situates the characters, with all their hopes, opinions, and commitments, in the context of the political events that have shaped them. He hopes to show how Socrates’ investigation of the good life amid the political and moral decline of imperial Athens can serve as a model for us today, confronted as we are by similar circumstances. After that, he plans to resume work on a non-historical study of the nature of civilization and barbarism intended for a more general, educated audience.
In this course, students will read some of the great poems of the English tradition, together with landmark essays by major literary voices. Students will question for themselves what makes a poem a "classic," whether classics are possible in all genres, the role of time and history in turning a work into a classic, and whether a classic author speaks in her own voice or simply embodies a tradition. No knowledge of poetry or literary criticism is necessary to benefit from this course.
T.S. Eliot, What is a Classic?
T.S. Eliot, Tradition and the Individual Talent
T.S. Eliot, The Lovesong of J Alfred Prufrock
T.S. Eliot, Portrait of a Lady
Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve, What is a Classic?
John Crowe Ransom, Lycidas: A Poem Nearly Anonymous
John Milton, Lycidas
Shakespeare, Sonnets 1, 29, 106, 130
Clay Greene is a scholar of early modern literature and thought. He received his Ph.D. in English and Renaissance Studies at Yale. His work focuses on the literary, philosophical, and historical inheritances of early modern Greece and Rome.
Dr. Greene’s scholarly interests lie in early modern England's literary and intellectual culture, especially from the 1650s through the 1750s. Within that broad framework, he studies the intersections of philosophy, theology, and poetry, with a focus on the poetic work of John Milton. His dissertation project covered the revival of the Platonic doctrine of the pre-existence of the soul among English poets and philosophers, arguing that this revival constituted a genuine religious movement of significance. He is fascinated by how individual moral and spiritual considerations always take place against a complete background of metaphysical assumptions about the nature and significance of reality. No era better exemplifies this fact than the late seventeenth century, a time when the “world pictures” of entire societies were in radical flux. Recently, his interests have shifted from the metaphysical to the physical, focusing on the imagination of warfare in early modernity. Still, even here, the focus remains on how beliefs about war crucially depend upon general beliefs about man’s role in the cosmic drama of creation.
Dr. Greene’s next project is a study of the relationship between epic poetry and warfare, focusing on the sublime poetics of physical size and power. "Paradise Lost" is at the center of that study, which also includes William Davenant’s "Gondibert," John Dryden’s "Annus Mirabilis," and short works by Joseph Addison and Aphra Behn.
"It is impossible to read the compositions of the most celebrated writers of the present day without being startled with the electric life which burns within their words." So wrote the English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1821. Through close readings of some of the greatest poems and manifestos of English Romanticism, this course will examine how the Romantics challenged traditional assumptions about the nature and purpose of poetry with their startling, electrifying, and sometimes dangerous new poetic style.
Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism
William Wordsworth, excerpts from the Preface to Lyrical Ballads
William Wordsworth, Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey
Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Kubla Khan
Percy Bysshe Shelley, excerpts from A Defence of Poetry
Percy Bysshe Shelley, Ode to the West Wind
Percy Bysshe Shelley, Ozymandias
John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn
John Keats, Ode to a Nightingale
Kirsten Hall Herlin graduated from Hillsdale College and completed her PhD in English at the University of Texas at Austin. Before coming to the University of Austin, she served as the Director of the Literature Program at Ave Maria University. She is currently the Managing Editor of the Genealogies of Modernity Journal. Her research focuses on religion and eighteenth-century British literature, and her work has been published in academic journals such as Modern Philology, Renascence, and Notes & Queries. She has also appeared as a guest on National Review’s podcast The Great Books and has written articles for The Weekly Standard and The New Atlantis.
We’ll examine these important questions in four sessions. Our first session will review AI topics and terminology, including a bit of AI history, and how to work with an LLM like ChatGPT. Our second session will examine the likely near and longer term impacts of AI on the human experience. The third will look at how AI works “under the hood,” covering a bit ofthe mathematics of deep learning. And the fourth will address the “hard problem of consciousness” and whether machines can truly think.
Our first session will include trying out some LLMs. Check these three out in advance.
We'll look at how to effectively prompt an LLM. Here are some good online references on this.
Our intro session includes an overview of AI history. This is a good timeline summary.
These recent news articles are representative of near term concerns regarding AI copyright and liability.
These articles offer a variety of takes on the mid-term concern over AI-induced unemployment, ranging from pessimistic to optimistic.
The third session is the most technical. You don't have to understand all the math in detail, but these excellent explanations by 3Brown1Blue, perhaps the finest explainer of mathematical concepts on the web today, will give you a feel for them.
We'll cover several AI areas that are not LLMs or transformers. Here are good overviews of those.
Our fourth session is the most deeply philosophical, and addresses the long term possibility of human-level AI, and whether such AI should be regarded as conscious or having rights. A central thought-experiment in this is Searle's Chinese Room argument, summarized well in these two references. Pay attention not only to the argument, but to the counterarguments offered.
These are optional/supplemental references, including a talk by Searle, giving a sense of the person behind the CRA, and also his paper on the CRS.
And finally, here are two articles discussion AI rights, one light, and the other much deeper.
Dr. Staley has 35 years of combined experience in academia and industry. He has taught computer science at UC Santa Barbara, Cal Poly SLO, and Principia College. Staley has built software and managed software development projects for a variety of small and large organizations, and has cofounded several small software companies.
The end is not to prove that we are right. Rather, our program brings diverse minds together so that we can clarify what we do and do not know. This passionate pursuit of truth, however elusive it may be, is at the heart of all of our programs.
Eligibility: Participants must be at least 15 years old. The program is designed for rising high school juniors and seniors.
Cost: The program is tuition-free. Participants will receive complimentary meals daily. Participants are responsible for their travel and lodging expenses as applicable, and the costs of assigned reading materials/books.
Location: Forthcoming (Denver, Colorado)
Dates: Friday, June 7 through Sunday, June 9, 2024
Parental Supervision Required: Because this is not an overnight program, those participants coming from outside Austin are required to make their own arrangements for lodging. The University of Austin can neither provide housing nor assist with housing requests. The University is not responsible for supervising, chaperoning, or otherwise caring for students, and all participants are required to have adult supervision outside program hours.
Applicants are not required to be U.S. citizens, but they must be proficient in English. At this time, UATX cannot provide assistance with visa applications nor with lodging or housing needs.
Our program is not a credit-bearing or degree program. Students may not earn continuing education credits, credit hours, or a diploma for participation in this program.
Register your interest by May 31, 2024, and a member of the university will reach out to confirm your attendance or let you know if you have been added to the waitlist.
Further questions? Please email programs@uaustin.org.