Life of the mind tour

In this pre-college, immersive summer program, the University of Austin brings its undergraduate curriculum to high school students. Small seminar courses challenge students with college-level coursework while evening social activities are designed to help students become familiar with college life.

courses

Shakespeare’s Hamlet

Shakespeare’s Hamlet is an intellectual called upon to act. But what should he do? What kind of hero should he try to be? Christian or “antique Roman”? Catholic or Protestant? Medieval or modern? In this course, we will explore Shakespeare's best-known tragedy, as well as Tom Stoppard's comic adaptation, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, and ask ourselves how Hamlet might be reimagined for our current historical moment.

readings:

Plato, Republic (Book 2-3 Excerpt)

Aristotle, Ethics (Book 2 Excerpt)

Alan Bloom, 'Music,' from The Closing of the American Mind

Scruton, Music and Morality

Instructor:
Dean Patrick Gray

Professor Patrick Gray is UATX's Dean of the Center for Arts and Letters. Previously, Gray served as Director of Liberal Arts at Durham University, where he was responsible for designing and introducing a new interdisciplinary core curriculum in the humanities. Before taking up his appointment at Durham, Gray taught comparative literature at Deep Springs College and the United States Military Academy at West Point. Gray is the author of Shakespeare and the Fall of the Roman Republic, editor of Shakespeare and the Ethics of War, and co-editor of Shakespeare and Renaissance Ethics and Shakespeare and Montaigne.

Data, Decisions, and AI/ML Discoveries

Explore with us! Learn about data science and dynamic decision-making in this curiosity-driven class. We'll learn about foundational machine-learning (ML) models and how to instantiate them with our own data. We'll also explore and discover how choices we make in constructing our ML models impact outcomes. Prerequisites: A willingness to take chances and make mistakes. No prior coding experience required.

readings:

Discussion One: Plato, Apology, pt. 1

Discussion Two: Plato, Apology, pt. 2

Discussion Three: Plato, Crito, pt. 1

Discussion Four: Plato, Crito, pt. 2

Instructor:
Samuel Schwartz 

Dr. Sam Schwartz is a recent graduate from the Department of Computer Science at the University of Oregon. Sam earned his master's degree in Mathematics from Utah State University, where he also earned his bachelor's degree as a double major in Mathematics and Computer Science with minors in Spanish and Organizational Communication. Sam has also spent time working with a variety of federal government national laboratories, small businesses and large technology companies, and teaching high school English in Chile. When not working, Sam enjoys driving up and down Oregon's beautiful coast with his dog.

Chance, Games, and Decisions

Begin to master probability and good decision-making when faced with uncertainty. Topics include counting techniques and probability theory, classic chance problems such as the Monty Hall and Birthday Problems, expected value and variance, and basic decision and game theory. Applications will be stressed through examples.

readings:

Plato: Republic, Book 1, 330d-339e

Plato: Republic, Book 2, 357a-368c

Plato: Republic, Book 6, 487a–489d, 496a–497d

Plato: Republic, Book 8, 559d–563e

a close up of a man in a suit and tie smiling
Instructor:
Dean David Ruth

Professor David Ruth is Dean of UATX's Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Previously, Ruth held several leadership positions as a Permanent Military Professor of Mathematics at the United States Naval Academy, where he was an award-winning teacher from 2009 until 2022. Ruth has authored several articles in a variety of statistics journals, as well as a book chapter on mathematics in cybersecurity. Prior to his academic work, Ruth led and served as a naval officer with operational experience in submarine and surface warfare, nuclear power, oceanography, and meteorology.

Great Dystopian Fiction 

ladder leaning against a bookshelf in a library

This seminar will undertake a careful reading of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley’s prophetic vision of life in a future dystopia. Published in 1932, Brave New World disturbingly anticipates many basic features of life in 2024.

readings:

T.S. Eliot, What is a Classic?

T.S. Eliot, Tradition and the Individual Talent

T.S. Eliot,  The Lovesong of J Alfred Prufrock

T.S. Eliot,  Portrait of a Lady

Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve, What is a Classic?

John Crowe Ransom, Lycidas: A Poem Nearly Anonymous

John Milton, Lycidas

Shakespeare, Sonnets 1, 29, 106, 130

a close up of a man in a suit and pink shirt
Instructor:
Provost Jacob Howland

Professor Jacob Howland is Dean of UATX’s Intellectual Foundations program, which comprises the first two years of our undergraduate curriculum. Previously, Howland served as McFarlin Professor of Philosophy at the University of Tulsa and Senior Fellow at the Tikvah Fund. He is the author of five books and one edited book, including two on Plato’s Republic as well as studies of Kierkegaard and the Talmud. Howland’s articles have appeared in The New Criterion, City Journal, and The Nation, among others.

Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey 

there are two birds that are standing on a tree branch

What does the fictional world in the pages of a book have to do with the world in which we really live? This question is at the heart of Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey, a comic coming-of-age story that follows the misadventures of its impressionable young heroine, Catherine Morland, whose imagination is carried away by reading too many gothic novels. Through discussion and close reading, students in this seminar will explore what Austen’s novel has to say about the power of fiction both to reveal and distort the truth about ourselves and others, the role stories play in forming our character and judgment, and how learning to read well can teach us to live well.

readings:

Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism

William Wordsworth, excerpts from the Preface to Lyrical Ballads

William Wordsworth, Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey

Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Kubla Khan

Percy Bysshe Shelley, excerpts from A Defence of Poetry

Percy Bysshe Shelley, Ode to the West Wind

Percy Bysshe Shelley, Ozymandias

John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn

John Keats, Ode to a Nightingale

woman with long hair smiling at the camera
Instructor:
Kirsten Herlin

Kirsten Hall Herlin graduated from Hillsdale College and completed her PhD in English at the University of Texas at Austin. Before coming to the University of Austin, she served as the Director of the Literature Program at Ave Maria University. She is currently the Managing Editor of the Genealogies of Modernity Journal. Her research focuses on religion and eighteenth-century British literature, and her work has been published in academic journals such as Modern Philology, Renascence, and Notes & Queries. She has also appeared as a guest on National Review’s podcast The Great Books and has written articles for The Weekly Standard and The New Atlantis.

The Success and Failure of Government Policy 

This seminar will investigate the causes of policy success and failure through the lens of political philosophy, history, and economics. We will discuss historical examples of success and failure in several different policy areas, e.g., war, economy, health / nutrition, environment, and space flight. 

readings:
first session:

Our first session will include trying out some LLMs. Check these three out in advance.

We'll look at how to effectively prompt an LLM. Here are some good online references on this.

Our intro session includes an overview of AI history. This is a good timeline summary.

second session

These recent news articles are representative of near term concerns regarding AI copyright and liability.

These articles offer a variety of takes on the mid-term concern over AI-induced unemployment, ranging from pessimistic to optimistic.

Third Session:

The third session is the most technical. You don't have to understand all the math in detail, but these excellent explanations by 3Brown1Blue, perhaps the finest explainer of mathematical concepts on the web today, will give you a feel for them.

We'll cover several AI areas that are not LLMs or transformers. Here are good overviews of those.

fourth session

Our fourth session is the most deeply philosophical, and addresses the long term possibility of human-level AI, and whether such AI should be regarded as conscious or having rights. A central thought-experiment in this is Searle's Chinese Room argument, summarized well in these two references. Pay attention not only to the argument, but to the counterarguments offered.

These are optional/supplemental references, including a talk by Searle, giving a sense of the person behind the CRA, and also his paper on the CRS.

And finally, here are two articles discussion AI rights, one light, and the other much deeper.

Instructor:
Scott Scheall

Scott Scheall is Associate Professor of Philosophy & Economics in the Center for Economics, Politics & History. Prior to joining the University of Austin, he taught for fourteen years at Arizona State University. Scott’s research considers the significance of human ignorance for decision-making, particularly in the political realm. He is the author of two books, F. A. Hayek and the Epistemology of Politics: The Curious Task of Economics and Dialogues concerning Natural Politics: A Modern Philosophical Dialogue about Policymaker Ignorance, a unique textbook freely available for use in courses in political philosophy, political science, economics, and political economy. His work has appeared in journals in philosophy, political economy, history of economics, bioethics, and cognitive psychology. Scott is co-editor of Review of the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, and founder, producer, and former co-host of the long-running podcast Smith and Marx Walk into a Bar: A History of Economics Podcast. He occasionally posts and podcasts at his Substack page, The Problem of Policymaker Ignorance (policymakerignorance.substack.com).

The Good Person and the Good Citizen: Navigating the 2024 Election with Plato

The 2024 Election poses profound questions about what it means to be a good person and a good citizen, and whether those two things are ultimately compatible. To understand our enduring moral and civic duties, we turn to Plato’s classic dialogues, The Apology of Socrates and Crito. Here, we see Socrates' own attempts to grapple with the demands of public and private life in a democracy not unlike our own, and whether one must ultimately take precedence over the other. Should we become partisan zealots like many Americans, or should we choose to abstain from political life altogether like many others?  Should our desire for truth outweigh our civic duties, or do the demands of nation and country trump our own individual reason? Do either of our political party’s views of democracy rise to the level of true democracy? This will be an opportunity to apply Plato’s nuanced discussion to our own political situation in 2024, and it will enable us to speak intelligently to debates we will inevitably have as Election 2024 draws near.

readings:
first session:

Our first session will include trying out some LLMs. Check these three out in advance.

We'll look at how to effectively prompt an LLM. Here are some good online references on this.

Our intro session includes an overview of AI history. This is a good timeline summary.

second session

These recent news articles are representative of near term concerns regarding AI copyright and liability.

These articles offer a variety of takes on the mid-term concern over AI-induced unemployment, ranging from pessimistic to optimistic.

Third Session:

The third session is the most technical. You don't have to understand all the math in detail, but these excellent explanations by 3Brown1Blue, perhaps the finest explainer of mathematical concepts on the web today, will give you a feel for them.

We'll cover several AI areas that are not LLMs or transformers. Here are good overviews of those.

fourth session

Our fourth session is the most deeply philosophical, and addresses the long term possibility of human-level AI, and whether such AI should be regarded as conscious or having rights. A central thought-experiment in this is Searle's Chinese Room argument, summarized well in these two references. Pay attention not only to the argument, but to the counterarguments offered.

These are optional/supplemental references, including a talk by Searle, giving a sense of the person behind the CRA, and also his paper on the CRS.

And finally, here are two articles discussion AI rights, one light, and the other much deeper.

man with glasses and a beard wearing a brown jacket
Instructor:
Jacob Wolf

Jacob Wolf is a founding faculty member of the University of Austin, where he is Assistant Professor of Politics in the Center for Economics, Politics, and History. He was previously Assistant Professor of Government in the Honors College and the College of Arts and Sciences at Regent University, where he also served as the Associate Director of the Lincoln Program in America's Founding Ideals. Before these positions, Jacob was the 2020-2021 John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Fellow in the James Madison Program at Princeton University.  He received his Ph.D. in political science from Boston College in 2020, double majoring in political theory and American politics. His current research employs insights from those two disciplines to understand contemporary changes in American religious beliefs and practices. In particular, he studies the social and religious ramifications of individualism—especially expressive individualism.  His overall scholarly objective is to demonstrate how ideas and presuppositions about human nature have profound consequences for both individuals and society. His academic writing has been published in Perspectives on Political Science, Political Science Reviewer, Interpretation, and The Public Discourse. His book manuscript, tentatively-titled "Harmonizing Heaven and Earth," argues that individualism—and not secularization—is responsible for large scale changes in American religion.  He has been awarded scholarly fellowships from The Philadelphia Society, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, the Jack Miller Center, the Philos Project, and the Institute for Humane Studies.  He is the 2022 recipient of the Jack Miller Center's Award for Excellence in Civic Education as well as the 2018 Donald J. White Award for Teaching Excellence from Boston College.

Ideology: Concept and Clash in Contemporary Politics 

Ideology is hard to understand when you have one, because that ideology shapes your perceptions,
especially how you perceive other ideologies. This seminar examines some useful ways of rising
above this paradox to examine and compare influential ideologies (fascism, communism, and
Islamism), as well as the ideological movement of our time—identity authoritarianism, often known
as wokeness or wokeism.

readings:
first session:

Our first session will include trying out some LLMs. Check these three out in advance.

We'll look at how to effectively prompt an LLM. Here are some good online references on this.

Our intro session includes an overview of AI history. This is a good timeline summary.

second session

These recent news articles are representative of near term concerns regarding AI copyright and liability.

These articles offer a variety of takes on the mid-term concern over AI-induced unemployment, ranging from pessimistic to optimistic.

Third Session:

The third session is the most technical. You don't have to understand all the math in detail, but these excellent explanations by 3Brown1Blue, perhaps the finest explainer of mathematical concepts on the web today, will give you a feel for them.

We'll cover several AI areas that are not LLMs or transformers. Here are good overviews of those.

fourth session

Our fourth session is the most deeply philosophical, and addresses the long term possibility of human-level AI, and whether such AI should be regarded as conscious or having rights. A central thought-experiment in this is Searle's Chinese Room argument, summarized well in these two references. Pay attention not only to the argument, but to the counterarguments offered.

These are optional/supplemental references, including a talk by Searle, giving a sense of the person behind the CRA, and also his paper on the CRS.

And finally, here are two articles discussion AI rights, one light, and the other much deeper.

Instructor:
Dean Morgan Marietta

Morgan Marietta is Dean of the Center for Economics, Politics & History. Prior to joining the University of Austin, he taught at the University of Massachusetts Lowell for eleven years and served as Chair of Political Science (briefly) at the University of Texas at Arlington. He studies the political consequences of belief, focusing on constitutional politics, political psychology, and facts in politics. He is the author of four books, including A Citizen’s Guide to American IdeologyA Citizen’s Guide to the Constitution and the Supreme CourtThe Politics of Sacred Rhetoric: Absolutist Appeals and Political Persuasion, and most recently One Nation, Two Realities: Dueling Facts in American Democracy. His studies of contemporary politics, including absolutist rhetoric, ideological premises, the rhetoric of reality, and the role of hubris have appeared in the leading journals in political science, including the Journal of Politics, British Journal of Political Science, and the American Political Science Review. He is the founding editor of the annual SCOTUS series at Palgrave Macmillan on the major rulings of the Supreme Court and is a regular commentator on constitutional politics. His current book project is The Supreme Court of Facts, on the role of the Court in addressing disputed perceptions of reality.

Courses

Great Dystopian Fiction

Ideology: Concept and Clash in Contemporary Politics

Introduction to Game Theory and Strategy

Making Hard Decisions: Revisiting the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

Shakespeare’s Hamlet

The 2024 Election

Course offerings are prospective and subject to change.

details And Requirements

Eligibility & Cost

Eligibility: Participants must be at least 15 years old. The program is designed for rising high school juniors and seniors.

Cost: The program is tuition-free. Participants will receive complimentary meals daily. Participants are responsible for their travel and lodging expenses as applicable, and the costs of assigned reading materials/books.

Location & Dates

Location: University of Austin (Austin, Texas)

Dates: Thursday, August 1 through Saturday, August 3, 2024 (three full days)

Time: 8:00am - 5:00pm daily

Arrangements

Parental Supervision Required: Because this is not an overnight program, those participants coming from outside Austin are required to make their own arrangements for lodging. The University of Austin can neither provide housing nor assist with housing requests. The University is not responsible for supervising, chaperoning, or otherwise caring for students, and all participants are required to have adult supervision outside program hours.

International Students

Applicants are not required to be U.S. citizens, but they must be proficient in English. At this time, UATX cannot provide assistance with visa applications nor with lodging or housing needs.

Academic Credit

Our program is not a credit-bearing or degree program. Students may not earn continuing education credits, credit hours, or a diploma for participation in this program.

Deadline

Register your interest by June 30, 2024, and a member of the university will reach out to confirm your attendance or let you know if you have been added to the waitlist.

Further questions? Please email programs@uaustin.org.

Applications Closed

dare to think

group of people sitting around a table with papers