Many universities claim to be committed to academic freedom, including freedom of speech and inquiry. And this commitment has served as a sound lodestar by which universities have oriented their curriculum and culture. But academic freedom is not necessarily an end in itself: it assumes the durability of a deeper foundation. Academic freedom ceases to matter if the students and faculty who exercise it do not believe that life has an innate purpose, that truth can be discovered, and that our existence ought to be guided by something outside of our own passions.
The past decades have seen the emergence of a new culture, one that undermines meaning, morality, and truth’s existence. This new culture erodes the Western liberal values that bind our nation together. Radical individualism, the idea that one’s personal identity is unrestrained by nature or tradition, has replaced all other religious or philosophical considerations as the standard for judging personal and political activity. Without a shared outlook on the greatest questions, without a shared belief that the greatest questions are even worth asking, deliberation is impossible. Conversations become innately contentious, innately us versus them. Discourse is reduced from a shared pursuit of truth to a clash of unmoored opinions.
Slowly but surely, it has become clear that freedom alone, without truth as the lodestar, causes societies to spiral into chaos, and erodes personal relationships and meaning. Our thriving requires orientation towards something outside of ourselves. The University of Austin’s fearless pursuit of truth empowers freedom to act as a tool, as a sine qua non, towards the highest of human ends: the pursuit of an understanding of existence that is beyond ourselves. Without truth as a lodestar, there is no true freedom; at best we are left with the freedom to debate and ask questions, but only so long as we do not offend others’ personal ideologies.
This pursuit will shape UATX's education in multiple ways, from Chatham House rule in the classroom to constitutional protections for the freedom of inquiry of faculty and students. But the Austin Union is about one specific form of practice: bringing true debate back to the forefront of American universities as a way to widen, test, and refine our perceptions of truth.
But opinions cannot be refined without resistance. No two people can build a relationship without laying the bricks of disagreement to rest between themselves. No society can be sustained without a peaceful mode of public civil discourse. Debate is a necessary part of life, and it must be modeled within our higher institutions—institutions of education, yes, but also of politics, culture, and media. Through the Austin Union, UATX will build a model of civil discourse.